Skip to content

有紧急法律疑难?请立即致电 (852) 3416 1711 与本行联系。

Covid-19 – are employees protected?

Covid-19 – are employees protected?

What are your rights if you become ill with the coronavirus in the course of your work? Boase Cohen & Collins Associate Stephanie Lai examines whether a claim can be brought under the Employees’ Compensation Ordinance.

Hong Kong, 2 April 2020: In response to the latest escalation in confirmed Covid-19 cases, the government has once again adjusted public services and made special work arrangements for civil servants to reduce social contacts. However, employees in many private companies are still required to report for work amidst the outbreak.

Certainly, from an employment law perspective, it is not mandatory for companies to close their businesses in line with the government’s policies regarding some of its departments. So this begs the question: if an employee contracts Covid-19 in the course of work, can they claim compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Ordinance (ECO)?

Given the present climate, we may expect many more employees will be asking this question. With this in mind, it is important to understand the legal aspects under the ECO.

1. A No-Fault System for Work Injuries

The ECO establishes a no-fault, non-contributory employee compensation system for work-related injuries. This means that the employer does not have to be at fault for the employee diagnosed with Covid-19. So even if the employer had followed all the recommendations and guidelines for Covid-19 control in the workplace published by the Centre for Health Protection and had taken all other appropriate precautions, if an employee contracts Covid-19 at work, he or she may still make a claim.

2. Employee suffers an “Occupational Disease”

According to the ECO, if an employee suffers from an “occupational disease” (as specified in the Second Schedule annexed to the ECO), the employer is generally liable to pay compensation under section 32 of the ECO. That said, Covid-19 is NOT a prescribed occupational disease under the ECO.

While the public has called for the Hong Kong government to include Covid-19 as an “occupational disease” within the meaning of “occupational disease” under the ECO, the Labour Department issued a press release on 10 February 2020 stating that the proposed legislative amendment will require time and it can only be made when definite medical and epidemiological information is available and upon consulting with various stakeholders, including the insurance sector and related industries.

3. Employees’ Compensation for Job-related Injury

Under section 5 of the ECO, an employee may claim compensation if he or she sustains an injury, or their family may claim compensation if he or she dies, as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his or her employment.

Simply missing time from work having been diagnosed with Covid-19 does not automatically make an employee eligible for compensation under the ECO. Protection under the ECO applies where the injury (for the present purpose, contracting Covid-19), had been caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment.

An employee does not have to be infected while performing a specific job duty at his or her normal workplace. The first limb would be whether the employee was acting within the scope of what he or she was employed to do or was doing something incidental to the job even it was not part of the ordinary course of work. This would be a matter of fact and degree. Some situations in which employees may be eligible to receive Employees’ Compensation for contracting Covid-19 include:

  • Travelling for work
  • Attending a conference for work
  • Meeting a client
  • Attending a work-related event

The second limb would be to show that the injury (or disease) was work-related. This would be a question of proof.

Here, it is perhaps worthy to mention the Court of Final Appeal in Sit Wing Yi Sibly v Berton Industrial Limited [2013] 5 HKLRD 225 where the Applicant’s claim for compensation under the ECO was dismissed as the cause of death of the employee was unknown.

Case Summary

The Deceased was found to have collapsed in the toilet of his office of employment and died before reaching the hospital. His cause of death could not be determined.

The Deceased’s widow applied for compensation under the ECO on the ground of “personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment is caused to an employee” under Section 5(1) of the ECO. The Deceased’s widow also relied on the presumption under Section 5(4) that “an accident arising in the course of an employee’s employment shall be deemed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, also to have arisen out of an employment”, arguing that where the injury occurred at work, the employer had an onus of adducing evidence to show the injury was not caused by an accident.

The widow’s claim was rejected. The Appeal Court held:

  • The presumption under Section 5(4) did not go to the distinct and earlier question of whether the injury was by accident, and is logically anterior to, any question of whether what has happened arose out of or in the course of employment; thus, it did not assist the claim.
  • The expression “injury by accident” encompasses cause and effect, with accident as the cause and injury as the effect. The accident must be distinct from the injury, with the accident being at least a contributory cause and the injury being the effect. In this case, without a known cause of death, the injury could hardly be “by accident”.

Since insurance companies will likely get flooded with Covid-19 related claims, they will be looking for cogent evidence that the employee got infected on the job and not somewhere else. It would therefore be a challenge for employees to pinpoint the specific “cause” of the injury and whether it was “a personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment”, since the incubation period for Covid-19 ranges from 1-14 days (according to the Centre for Health Protection).

Concluding Remarks

If an employee contracts or suspects having contracted Covid-19 during the course of work (or otherwise), they should immediately inform their employer so that the employer can notify the Labour Department of the injury and take the necessary precautionary measures to minimise the risk of other employees becoming infected.

If the employee has doubt whether the employer has reported the injury to the Labour Department, the employee can approach the Employees’ Compensation Division of the Labour Department directly.

At the same time, regardless of where they may have become sick or whatever their legal rights may be, it is important for a responsible employee to stay at home and refrain from coming to work if they are diagnosed with or suspected to have contracted Covid-19.

Author: Stephanie Lai, Associate
Telephone: (+852) 3416 1789
Email: StephanieLai@boasecohencollins.com

If any advice or assistance is needed, please contact our Insurance & Personal Injuries Department:

Telephone: (+852) 3416 1711
Fax: (+852) 2529 5035
Email: teddy@boasecohencollins.com

EmployeesCovid

Strict hygiene regulations are being imposed in workplaces to combat the coronavirus.

按此了解本行逾39年的专业法律经验。

本行的律师团队友好亲切、平易近人,乐于解答您的疑问,并为您提供合理的建议。

联系我們

BC&C-contact-us

新闻及知识

了解更多關于本行的工作和其他咨询。订阅本行的企业通讯,以确保您收到我们的最新消息。

  • 这个字段是用于验证目的,应该保持不变。

Beauticians and their duty of care

By Teresa Leung Hong Kong, 20 November 2024: Can you su […]

Read more

Carrian saga provides a trip back in time

Hong Kong, 19 November 2024: The biggest corporate corr […]

Read more

Old habits and an escalating problem

Hong Kong, 13 November 2024: In a fast-moving world, Ak […]

Read more

Focus on AI at Gold Coast gathering

Hong Kong, 11 November 2024: The impact of artificial i […]

Read more

Window of opportunity for insurers

By Jeffrey Chan, Leann Au and Waverly Chan Hong Kong, 7 […]

Read more